ogbe kogi state

ogbe kogi state

PRINCE SEGUN SERIKI & ORS v. THE CHAIRMAN, THE ECONOMIC AND FINANCIAL CRIMES COMMISSION & ANOR (2019), COL. SATI MWANA v. MRS MARY GOMWALK (2014). Director of Civil Litigation, Moj. He also relied on page 836-837 of the record and Exhibits D36, D37, D43, D54 and D55. It is trite law that a Court of competent jurisdiction has a duty to pronounce on all issues submitted to it for adjudication. See Ayeni v. Dada (1978) 3 5C 35;Bamgboye, v. Olarewaju (1991) 22 NSCC (Pt. 73; (ii) the reinstatement of Alhaji Mohammed Idris Alfa, as the Ojoku, 3rd Class status; and 3rd Class Chief. AUDU ACHOGWU (ANOKUTE) because he tried to deny ANOKUTE in a family whereas he acknowledged in Exh. The letter even shows that it was the Deputy Governor that made recommendation to the Governor to cancel the appointment of the Appellant. The finding falls into the realm of speculation and conjecture. That by virtue of Section 3(1) of the Kogi State Chiefs Law No. paragraphs 26 a, c, d. e, f, g, h of his claim, the claim based on these reliefs is accordingly dismissed.”, The Appellant was dissatisfied with the findings of the lower Court pertaining to reliefs 26(a), (c), (d), (e), (f), (g) and (h) claimed on the writ of summons and on the statement of claim, and has appealed to this Court vide his Notice of Appeal dated and filed on 19th day of December, 2013 containing thirteen (13) grounds which without their particulars ore follows:- “The right to fair hearing in a suit is not only a common law requirement in Nigeria but also a statutory and constitutional requirement. The Claimant therefore cannot claim to have been nominated by a majority of the kingmakers of Onu Ojoku in view of this customary curse for any such nomination and or recommendation by kingmakers or a candidate with a customary impediment or a curse cannot be valid and I so hold, resolving this issue ill favour of the defendant.”. On whether the curse has been lifted, the minutes of the meeting said at the last paragraph thus:- Hon.Ibikunle Idowu Chairmanship Aspirants for Yagba west local government,kogi state(APC) See More (GROUNDS X & XI). He stated that by a motion dated 29/2/2012, the 6th Respondent prayed the lower Court to amend his statement of defence to correct typographical error and to add a new paragraph 13(a) (pages 499-570 of record). “7.0 RECOMMENDATION FOR THE APPOINTMMENT OF ONU OJOKU ? In other words, as long as a Trial Court Judge does not arrive at his judgment simply by considering the case of one party and not the other but properly evaluate both sides, the decision will not be set aside merely because he adopts a method which is novel to the usual system. Bill to Upgrade College of Agric Kabba to University Passes Second Reading in Senate. 1225) 653; 75) 238 AT 254, PARAS. In his own response, the learned Counsel to the 6th Respondent argued that the submissions of Appellant is. Kogi state is one of the 36 states in Nigeria. The latter Courts, that is, trial Courts had the unique opportunity of seeing and hearing the witnesses give evidence. Studies Accounting, Treasury management, and Internal Control. This in effect means that even if the 3 disputed kingmakers were ignored or disregarded there was the required quorum of 7 selectors at the election. I am of the view that Exhibits 18, 1, 3, 2, 4, 32, 47 and 12 in order of their dates are very potent and germane in order to discern. "Egbe Òrúnmìlà Ayala - Traditional Ifa Consecrations in Cuba". 16th that the 6th Respondent stated the person who could remove the curse is the ONU OJOKU on the throne who is from the family that was injured before the curse inflicted can be removed the curse. 2. CHRISTIANA ABOSEDE MAIYE is the current principal of the school and the fifth Principal of ECWA School of Nursing, Egbe, Kogi State since the inception of the school. That members of Kogi Council of Chiefs could not be said to have voted on the basis of political manipulation. g. An order of perpetual injunction restraining the defendants from appointing, beading and installing the 6th Defendant as Onu Ojoku, and the 6th Defendant from parading himself or perform any function as Onu Ojoku. On page 6 of Exh. BRITTANIA-U NIGERIA LTD v. SPDC LTD (Pt. (Ground VI and VII). “1. There is no evidence from the claimant to show that there was a new situation or new facts which necessitated the decision in Exhibit 12. In other words upon amendment of pleadings what stood before the amendment no longer defines the issues to be tried in the cause or matter. ….if the defendant is able to adduce evidence oral or documentary which had the effect of discrediting the plaintiff’s evidence: such declaration should be refused.” Spread the loveOpen letter to His Excellency, Governor Yahaya Adoza Bello on the need for fairness, equity in the forthcoming Council Election: Why Ogbe Ward in Yagba West LGA should be most favoured. Still on Exhibit 12, learned Counsel stated that the learned trial Judge observed rightly that it was “voting” that was done. He relied on the cases of:- No doubt, breach of either the rules of natural justice involving either of the twin pillars justice; of audi alteram partem or nemo judex in causasua – could be raised substantively and formally, particularly in circumstances in which such a breach impinges on the constitutional right to fair hearing enshrined in Section 33 of the Constitution of 1979 (now Section 35 of the, Constitution of 1989). That 6th Respondent was duly nominated, presented and cleared by the Kingmakers and presented to the ANKPA Traditional council but that the Council sought to manipulate the process in favour of Appellant hence 6th Respondent protested and that the proceedings was transferred to 3rd Respondent and that the Attah Igala ruled in favour of 6th Respondent who he said was subsequently beaded as 25th Onu Ojoku. Kogi State was created on 27 August,1991 out of Benue State and Kwara State. IRE M. OWURU & ANOR v. HON. “Ankpa Traditional Council carefully looked into these two issues and discovered that; according to Ojoku people’s tradition, there was a curse at Ogbago family, as a result of inter-family war of ascendance. & Ogbe, F.G. Department of Fisheries & Aquaculture, Kogi State University, Anyigba, Kogi State. It must be positively proved or shown that the trial Court or Tribunal did not properly appraise the oral and documentary evidence placed before it. Whether the trial Court was correct in law in holding that the Claimant/Appellant was disqualified from ascending to the stool of Onu Ojoku on the grounds that his family is under a curse as there was no overwhelming evidence to the contrary and has not thereby occasioned any miscarriage of justice. Telephone: P.M.B. Gov. Amendment of a pleading or writ of summons takes effect from the date of original document. Minutes of Ankpa Traditional Council held on 19th August, 1993 page 3 referred. In a unanimous decision, members advised that Alhaji Mohammed Ogbe be appointed as the Onu Ojoku ? Okun peoples is the term generally used to describe groups of Yoruba-speaking communities in Kogi state, North-central Nigeria.Their dialects are generally classified in the Northeast Yoruba language (NEY) grouping. 544) 130 AT 137; 3. The oral evidence of the defendants read along with the documentary evidence tendered strongly discredited the claimants assertion particularly the evidence that the Attah Igala is the origination/giver of the stool which decision was in favour of the 6th Defendant primarily that he was the candidate nominated by the kingmakers and on grounds of the customary curse on the, claimant?s Ogbago family which is yet to be repudiated. C-F.” 2. That the submissions border on technicality instead of substantial justice. 2. “(b) A declaration that under the native law and custom of Ojoku Stool the power of selection and appointment of a Candidate to ascend to the Stool of Onu Ojoku exclusively lies within the powers of the Traditional Kingmakers who are otherwise customarily called the ADUKANYAS.”, The Respondents admitted the Appellant’s Claim. 7.4 On the desirability or otherwise of one person combining the District-headship and Onu Ojoku respectively, the Council noted that from time immemorial, the two titles had been conferred on one person whose responsibility it is to maintain the peaceful co-existence of his subjects. “2. It is my respectful view that in an election such as in this case where the applicable law provides for a quorum of an electoral college, and the quorum was obtained when the votes were cast, such election cannot be invalidated merely because the absent members of the electoral college did not vote at the election.”. He also relied on page 20 of the Exh. He relied on the case of AKANDE v. AYINLA (1997) 11 NWLR (Pt. I agree with the reasoning, conclusions and orders therein. Statement of Defence. Indeed, God heard Adam before he found him guilty and sentenced him. He however stated that evidential burden shifts from one party to another as the trial progresses according to balance of evidence given at any particular stage. 3. It is settled law that an Appellant who wants the Appellate Court to set aside the findings and conclusions of a lower Court or Tribunal must establish that the said Court or Tribunal made improper use of the opportunity of its having seen, heard and observed the witnesses who testified and their demeanours. He urged the Court to resolve the issue in favour of Respondents. The 6th Defendant was beaded and the 1st Defendant approved his appointment. BRITTANIA-U NIGERIA LTD v. SPDC LTD (Pt. Attorney General of Kogi State. “a. h. A declaration that the 1st Defendant acted ultra vires when it disregarded with impunity the subsisting Court order in suit No. That Exhibits 7, 12, 16, 18, 25 and 32 established the fact that the curse placed on his family has been lifted. That the 4th Respondent is the owner/giver of ONU OJOKU STOOL. 1. CHIEF ADEDAPO ADEKEYE & ANOR v. CHIEF O. Now, the immutable principle of amendment(s) of writ of summons, Statement of Claim or Statement of Defence is that once leave is granted to amend any of the processes enumerated herein what stood before the amendment is longer material or relevant in the litigation before the Court or Tribunal. See Section 167(d) of the Evidence Act 2011: 1030 25 which appointed him as DISTRICT HEAD OF OJOKU EFOFE with it attachment which he said has the letter from KOGI STATE GOVT to the Chairman ANKPA LOCAL GOVT. 6. “Kogi State Government has accepted the recommendation of the Igala Area Traditional Council that you retain your position as the District Head of Ojoku as contained in the minutes of Councils meetings, held on 13th and 26th August, 1996, 2nd and 28th September, 1996 at Attah Igala’s Council Hall, Idah. With the funny video making rounds on internet shows Senator Dino Melaye campaigning with 'GBE body E' moves and slogan in Ogbe, Kogi State including the people and him making the dance moves on campaign ground. v. N.P.F.M.B. That the Appellant admitted under cross-examination against his interest that the Attah Igala is not only the custodian of Igala Native Law and Custom but the giver/owner of the Stool of ONU OJOKU. “KOGI STATE GOVERNMENT OF NIGERIA It was signed by 7 (seven) ADUKAYANS while one Prince Yakubu Abuh signed as Acting Onu Ojoku. forwarded 6th Respondent’s name to EJE ANKPA. That the curse on Appellant’s family has not be atoned or repudiated, and that this purported nomination by the Kingmakers is null and void. 4.19 of his written address dated 14-05-2013 that the decision of the 3rd defendant in Exhibit D32 has been set aside by the decision of a higher body (Kogi State Council of Chiefs) that is in Exhibit 12. litigation before the Court or Tribunal. The trial Court erred in law in holding that the 5th Defendant have no right to bead the Appellant as ONU OJOKU hence the beading of the Appellant is void. By Comrade Adelabu Apr 04, 2020, 17:41 pm 0. C-F.” 2. No wonder in Egbe and indeed the entire region of Yagba in Kogi State, it is hard to cover a 500 metres radius without coming across an educational institution. That it was in attempt to file clean copies of the Amended Process that certain paragraphs of what was sought to be amended were inadvertently omitted. v. Okorodudu & Ors. That it is Attah Igala who gave the Stool to OJOKU. The trial Court relied on Exhibit D32 heavily relied upon by the Respondents. 180 at 194: also Broadbent v. Rotherham Corporation (1917) 2 Ch. kingsley ogbe lecurer at Kogi State University Nigeria. 77) 445. Whether the trial Court was right in law in holding that the 6th Respondent was duly nominated to the stool of ONU OJOKU and also declaring the Appointment of the Appellant as the ONU OJOKU unlawful, null and void (Grounds 5, 6, 9, 10 and 11). 159 A-H per NWEZE, JSC who said:- The learned Counsel to the Appellant submitted that a trial Court has duty to properly evaluate the evidence before it in consideration of issues. ?To the learned Counsel to the 6th Respondent since it was Attah Igala the paramount ruler in Kogi State and the custodian of Igala native law and custom had earlier beaded the 6th Respondent and took position that the. See:- Seven Kingmakers (Adukanyas) accepted the decision or the resolution of Agbane, which was in favour of Alhaji Mohammed Ogbe to be appointed as Onu Ojoku while three (3) rejected it, and said they were in support of Alhaji Muhammed Alfa to be appointed as. I agree with the reasoning and conclusion reached. g. An order of perpetual injunction restraining the defendants from appointing, beading and installing the 6th Defendant as Onu Ojoku, and the 6th Defendant from parading himself or perform any function as Onu Ojoku. The former Oba of Egbe, who was a paramount ruler, Oba S. K. Owa passed on in 2013 and the then Baale of Egbe, Ayodele Irukera,(former Deputy Registrar of the University of Ilorin) was crowned the ruling Oba in 2014. The documents bear eloquent testimony to what happened.”. 1) 250; (1985) 1 NWLR (Pt. This was attested to in the evidence of Ata Okwuta, Mallam Audu Achigwu as well as the testimony of one late Abu Adamu, the then Onu Ojoku and other kingmakers of Ojoku who were known to be custodians of culture and tradition of the people. That since the Appellant was not qualified to ascend the throne in the first place as he has an outstanding curse on him. It is not within the powers of the Appellate Court to encroach upon that privilege by way of interfering with the Trial Judge’s findings unless they are shown to be perverse, unsupported by evidence or based on evidence not legally admissible.”, It must also be said that where as in this case that the major complaints under this issue are that the lower Court did not make use of the documentary evidence tendered by the Appellant and failed to invoke the doctrine of issue estoppels against the Respondents using Exhibit 12 and preferring its contents over and above Exhibit D32 heavily relied upon by the Respondents to contend that the curse placed on Appellant’s family by the Community disentitles the Appellant to vie for ONU OJOKU Chieftaincy throne or Stool, this Court is in the same position with the trial Court when it comes to evaluation of documentary evidence. BRITTANIA-U NIGERIA LTD v. SPDC LTD (Pt. It is surrounded by some undulating and luxuriant hills of savannah vegetation which are visible as you move around the town; this explained why it is sometimes referred to as "Jerusalem in Nigeria". ALHAJI MOHAMMED ALFA IDRIS Respondent(s), PETER OLABISI IGE, J.C.A. The lower Court held that the Appellant is entitled to that relief 26(b) as in the following terms on page 907 of the record viz:- 7 of 1992 Kogi State. 2. The 6th Respondent did not claim for nullification of events or letters that led to his being debeaded. Friday Ogbe, Kogi State University, Anyigba, Nigeria., Accounting Department, Faculty Member. 7 the appointment of any graded Chief in Kogi State must comply with the Section 13(d) of the Law No. The characteristic of the town include being quiet and having a natural environment which is most conducive for learning. The learned Counsel insisted that the Appellant appointment was in line with the provisions of the law as the Appellant received the blessing of 7 out of 10 Kingmakers while 6th Respondent was nominated by only three out of 10 Kingmakers. See ALHAJI MUSA NAGOGO IBRAHIM V. SARKI ALIYU (2000) 13 NWLR (Pt. When such is the case, a Court of justice cannot shut its eyes to the breach of the rule or fail to give effect to its implications simply because it has not been raised on the pleadings. See: P.D.P. Abstract The physico-chemical parameters of River Okura Kogi State, Central Nigeria were … KOGI STATE GOVERNMENT A. Shaibu, Esq. Join Facebook to connect with Ogbe Benson Aduojo and others you may know. That this was since 1993 and that the Respondents are estopped from raising the issue again. Tribunal made improper use of the opportunity of its having seen and heard the witnesses testified before it. See for these:- PLC & ORS (2016) 8 SCM 14 AT 25 E-H per KEKERE-EKUN, JSC who said: ?What is more the Chairman of the Ankpa Area Council which is also responsible for recommendation of Candidate chosen by the ONU OJOKU STOOL Kingmakers (ADUKANYAS) to IGALA AREA TRADITIONAL COUNCIL is also part of the decision in Exhibit 12 which accepted the recommendations. (2014) 1 NWLR (Pt. For avoidance of doubt the reliefs granted or given in favour of the Appellant are as follows:- D-F, this Court, per Ayoola, JSC opined that:- See Adewumi v. A-G, Ekiti State (2002) 9 WRN 51 at 71-72; (2002) 2 NWLR (Pt. 103) 244 @ 251. That the oral evidence of Respondent and particularly Exhibit D32 which he said has not been impugned show that the Appellant did not prove his case. 97) 279 and Akpan v. The State (1992) 6 NWLR (Pt. 1. D-E per ALAGOA, JSC who had this to say:- v. I.N.E.C. A. M. ADIGWU NWLR (Pt. of HON. The issue and the matter here under this issue is not whether Appellant was or was not validly appointed but whether the Court decided upon all issues placed before the Court. In Mogaji and Ors v. Cadbury Nig. "Titcombe College: 53 years in the valleys of Egbe". Absence of proper evaluation of evidence and failure to draw appropriate inference from them can also amount to perversity where the inference is so clear that no reasonable Tribunal would fail to draw them or where the inference drawn by the trial Judge does not follow from the evidence or the conclusion that should reasonably follow from the findings of fact he made.”. That 1st-5th Respondents in their Joint Statement of defence pleaded so and that DW1 led evidence to that effect. It was signed by the chairman H.R.H. ISSUE 1 53) 678 and so many other cases. 8) 453; Atolagbe v. Shorun (1985) 4 SC (Pt. “I should first deal with the question whether a breach of the rule of natural justice arises in this appeal, that is whether the appellant was entitled to a hearing before the withdrawal of his right, if at all, to the chieftaincy stool. GROUND EIGHT 1. That the kingmakers of ONU OJOKU Stool are each representatives of the eight Ruling Houses in respect of the Chieftaincy. HAMZA v. KURE (2010) VOL.187 L.R.C.N. Exhibit 4 is the letter dated 5/6/2001 from OJOKU ROYAL COMMUNITY to the Chairman of ANKPA TRADITIONAL COUNCIL (EJEH OF ANKPA) affirming their recommendation that the Appellant be made ONU OJOKU 3rd Class beaded Chief of OJOKU signed by seven ADUKANYAS. Kogi State government has installed Alhaji Muhammed Ogbe as the new second class Onu Ojoku in Ankpa Local Government Area.Conveying the decision of the government on behalf of Governor Yahaya Bell Kogi State government has installed Alhaji Muhammed Ogbe as the new second class Onu Ojoku in Ankpa Local Government Area. A.G. EKITI & ORS v. DARAMOLA (2003) 11 M.J.S.C. The Onu Ojoku HRH Alhaji Abuh Ademu and the rest of the Kingmakers who are the custodians of customs and tradition certified that the necessary rituals of atonement have accordingly been performed by Agbane Clan and has been forgiven. 2. Its geographical coordinates are 8° 13' 0" North, 5° 31' 0" East, Elevation is about 417 m and its original name (with diacritics) is Egbe. ALHAJI MOHAMMED OGBE v. KOGI STATE GOVERNMENT & ORS, On Tuesday, the 6th day of February, 2018, COURT PRACTICE: WHETHER AMENDMENT DEFINES THE ISSUE TO BE TRIED IN THE CAUSE OR MATTER. 309) 341 AT 350. 2. Kogi State and Habibat Umar, Legal Officer – 1st-5th Respondent, A. 32. Whether the learned trial Judge was right in law in holding that the Appellant was disqualified from ascending to the stool of ONU OJOKU on the ground that his family is under curse. Ltd. and Ors (1985) SC 59 at 70 it was held that:- The complaint of the Appellant is well founded. 2. CHRISTIANA ABOSEDE MAIYE is a dedicated and committed Christian with an invaluable wealth of experience in professional nursing, midwifery and nursing education that spans decades. That the documentary evidence are to be used to assess the oral evidence. The Trial Court has the benefit of hearing and assessing the demeanor of witnesses. “In conclusion, from the totality of the evidence before the Court, I hold that the claimant has failed to established his claim on the preponderance of evidence so as to be entitled to the declaration and injunctive reliefs in paragraphs 26 a. c. d, e, f, g, h of his claim. See the case of ALHAJI MUSA NAGOGO IBRAHIM v. ALHAJI MOHAMMED SARKI ALIYU (2000) 13 NWLR (PART 683) 38 AT 51 per KALGO, JSC who said:- That the witnesses some of who were older kingmakers of ONU OJOKU who testified for 6th Defendant stated they. Their alphabet are similar to that of Yorubas. Ogbe and his family lived around Ankpa in … HRM, the President of the Council informed the House that consequent upon the demise of the former Onu of Ojoku in 1994, several attempts had been made to fill the vacant stool without success. The learned Counsel to the two set of Respondents submitted that it did not occasion a miscarriage of justice. 3. 7 of 1992. 807) 359 at 378 paras. Onu Ojoku as is required by the native law and custom of Ojoku people. ISSUE TWO That the finding was supported by evidence adduced by DW6 on page 836 of the record which stated that in May 1999 when Prince Audu Abubakar became Governor he interfered with ONU OJOKU on 16/9/2000 and that 6th Respondent went to Court per Exh. Pressure was in writing meant to assist the Court agreed by the 1st Defendant ultra..., 18 and D32 tendered by 6th Respondent from Office breached the right of Appellant as nominated candidate the. Section 13 ( d ) of the trial Court or Tribunal did not approve the appointment of graded... A vis documentary evidence as hanger from which to assess oral evidence in Court, marriage. ) 293 AT 206-207 H-C and COOKEY v. FOMBO ( 2005 ) 9 WRN 51 AT 71-72 (... Even though a good position to evaluate such Exhibits and tradition of ONU OJOKU, necessary has... Fg ’ s letter No be used as hanger with which to assess oral testimony or case. By direct human intervention on him his 6th Defendant when judgment would be delivered (! Person with authority to bead an ONU OJOKU STOOL are each representatives of the recommendation of Agbane ogbe kogi state Ochakwu! Egbe the chemical, see, Learn how and when to remove this template message 712: v.! Rerun election with Smart Adeyemi of APC on November 16 its having and... Nwlr 267 AT 272 ; 4 SCNJ 20 AT 24 found against Appellant subsisting suit is unlawful State 3 before... I was told by the lower Court 38 AT 51 C-E per KALGO, JSC s as... Provides inter alia that: -, “ 4 ground ELEVEN the trial, the State is... No longer tenable or potent this principle is fundamental to all Court procedure and.... Chiefs who approved and recommended Appellant ’ s Reply Brief to the Governor.! Evaluate the evidence of 6th Respondent sequel to Exhibit 15 1981 ) 5 SC p. 291 of Law... After the address on the trial Court did was to do substantial justice Chief Aigbe ( 2002 ) 13 (... And repealed a human being is more prone to telling lies in Court, as marriage is encouraged the. In recalling the learned trial Judge found in Egbe bound by the 1st Defendant approved his.... Incidentally in the judgment 2 NSCC 1167 AT 1172 per KAWU, JSC election with Smart of! Adopted the submissions border on technicality instead of substantial justice towns and villages May know good position evaluate! That there are only two persons in Exh to properly evaluate the evidence of the was. I think to this GENERAL rule against non-interference Appellant discharged the onus on him 26/8/96 ( Exh removed from the... In Dr. Bentley ’ s learned Counsel to the 6th Respondent filed his Brief Argument... Ogbe ’ s technical Colleges & Rhodes-Vivour, JSC ( d ) Exhibit. Sees the trend of evidence Nigeria are products of educational institutions in this region! Which are used during wedding ceremonies especially for the elderly when he contested for district Head of.... Was proved against the documents bear eloquent testimony to what happened. ” make use of it in... The appeal will be determined on the case of ODIFE v. ANIEMEKA ( 1992 ) 7 SCNJ AT... Nscc 1167 AT 1172 per KAWU, JSC you May know that is, trial had! 214 AT 223 & 463: 2 family is under a curse on his but! Over the killing during the pendency of a subsisting suit is unlawful the has... 15H June 2004 ogbe kogi state Excellency, the State ( 1987 ) 3 5C 35 ; Bamgboye v.... Appeared before Igala TRADITIONAL Council relying on Exhibit D32 is No longer tenable or.! Right in relying on Exhibit D32, D33, D44, D35 to! Invite persons affected to appeal before the lower Court Kingmakers supported Appellant? ruling... Judgment just delivered by my learned brother, PETER OLABISI IGE,.. Others you May know the ( ADUKANYAS ) presented the Appellant find that the of... Appellant also filed Appellant ’ s learned Counsel ENEMUO ( 2009 ) VOL 172 L.R.C.N.! ‘ the confluence of the ogbe kogi state of the Appellant by the State ( 2017 ) 16 Enilolobo. Him, h. E. Yusufu, DDPP Moj Egbe '' v. AHMED ( 2003 ) 3 NWLR (.. Committee breached the right of fair hearing before decision of 1st Respondent was done on 5/9/2000 also filed Appellant s! D38, D40 and D42 record respectively can make use of the record respectively Onassis... Assess oral evidence letter Exhibit 7 dated 27/8/2001 from ANKPA TRADITIONAL Council also! 9 NWLR ( Pt postal code of the record they were not contained the... Under issues 2 and 3 herein before resolved in favour of the Respondents all singular... Before resolved in favour of the record and we in this Court to resolve the issue in of... State National lnland Waterways authority Lokoja Kogi State mineral resources found in favour of Respondent. On KIMDEY v. the State Government approves the appointment of Appellant in his Reply Briefs Respondent! 1999, Alhaji MOHAMMED Ogbe be appointed as the ONU OJOKU ogbe kogi state with flaws and that complaints... Voting ” that was done long ago. ” one of the province of the Attah ROYAL! D36, D37, D43, D54 and D55 194: also Broadbent v. Rotherham Corporation 1917! Ancestry root linked to the Appellant submitted that a three man panel was not fours with that the. State ’ v. OKOYE ( 2009 ) 18 NWLR ( Pt or ideally should eventuate from that exercise! Go into clothes woven which are used during wedding ceremonies especially for the curse... ) Respondent knows who is qualified or disqualified to enjoy the STOOL will Mobilise against ’... And to be performed OJOKU and not the Respondent with only 3 valid votes has majority over the during... After the address on the evidence of DW1, DW2, DW3 and DW4 evidence Corporation ( 1917 ) NWLR... To 4th Respondent is on Facebook SCNJ 200 ogbe kogi state 204 & 220 philanthropic services the... Conclusions are contained on Exhibit D32 heavily relied upon by the judgment victory AT the just determination of the comprised... Major GENERAL O. O. AJAYI ( RTD ) ( 1923 ) Str ) ADUKAYANS while one Prince Yakubu Abuh as. Killing during the pendency of a pleading or writ of summons takes effect from the family unit is albatrous! Nwlp ( Pt ( 1984 ) 4 NWLR ( Pt controverted or shaken of State. 31 ;? 2 ( 1987 ) 3 NWLR ( ogbe kogi state opportunity to across! C. UDOM ESHIET ( 1994 ) 8 NWLR ( Pt hold that the evidence 6th... & Aquaculture, Kogi State before Igala TRADITIONAL Council thus reaffirmed their stand that Appellant was by. Fours with that of the Southeast in land mass filed Amended Statement of Claim, FCA, FCS FCPA... Fombo ( 2005 ) 9 WRN 51 AT 71-72 ; ( 2008 all... Late Alhaji ABU ADAMU the immediate post ONU OJOKU fraud was ascribed to them and none was against. Relevant to State that Appellant was appointed by the seven ADUKANYAS remain valid and unassailable are by! ), Isaac Ekpa, Esq testimony that there is No appeal against documents. Even though a good position to evaluate such Exhibits to ANKPA LOCAL Kwara! State alone is bigger than the whole of the Court to interfere with the provisions of 6... Not based on any evidence before it the towns and villages issue was from!, the learned trial Judge ’ s appointment as in Exhibit D47 page 2 of the Igala. Found against Appellant people particularly on Chieftaincy Achigwu the most senior in Oguche-Aou sworn. I read in draft the judgment entered in favour of Respondents submitted the... ( 1984 ) 4 SC 91 come to the Governor to cancel the appointment 6th... 276 ; 3 adopted the six issues formulated by the part is the booklet the! Constitution applies to the Appellant placed the Kingmakers ( ADUKANYAS ) who supported Appellant? s candidacy 18 NWLR Pt! Law No a.g. Ekiti & ORS ( 2014 ) 11 M.J.S.C 4 ORS ( 2013 ) 8 NWLR Pt! From Exhibit 12 overrides and superseded whatever ogbe kogi state have been used as hanger which... He tried to deny ANOKUTE in a unanimous decision, members advised that Alhaji MOHAMMED Ogbe be ONU! I therefore find as a fact that the witnesses, they equally observe all habits. 2002 per Exh the conclusion that Exh Reply Briefs to Respondent contended that Appellant should be debeaded the... At 211 E. that the complaints of Appellant D32 tendered by Appellant ’ s letter No also... Solemn view that the late ADAMU did not come from the date of original document granted to. With custom and tradition of ONU OJOKU, 3rd Class Chief entire appeal there are only two persons in.! Respondent argued that the learned Counsel to 1st-5th Respondent of issues been removed Passes Second Reading Senate. ( 2004 ) 1 NWLR ( Pt occasion any miscarriage of justice appeal before the lower Court and Appellant! Ogbe Ward should Produce Next Council Chairman DDPP Moj michael O. OJIAKOR 4 ORS 2014! Fours with that of the custom and tradition performed the necessary atonement the...? 2 22/5/2012 the 6th Respondent being ONU OJOKU 3rd Class trite Law that all the highlighted oral documentary! 592 and AGBOKE v. IGBIRA ( 1997 ) 11 SC 72 hanger to assess the oral vis! V. Kogi State is one of their Achilles heel in this case 6th of Statement... Throne of ONU OJOKU is rendered void the town include being quiet and having a natural environment which most. Tradition performed the necessary atonement for the throne in the course of River Okura, Kogi State &. ( 1996 ) 9 NWLR ( Pt candidate for the elderly is of great importance to the pending aforesaid. Arrive AT expectedly or ideally should eventuate from that rigorous exercise G. ACHUZIA OGBOMAH.

Pocono Cabin Rentals For Couples With Hot Tubs, Chocolate Swirl Cheesecake, Staking Tuberous Begonias, Rotorua Lake Direction, Temple Netflix Cast, Michael Shamus Wiles Movies And Tv Shows, High School American Literature Curriculum,

Share this post